Quote from: timmelon on 2022-05-12 00:56:00As I said earlier, that camera stabilization option is great when you want to record your off-road adventure .Tim! This isn't Spintires!
As I said earlier, that camera stabilization option is great when you want to record your off-road adventure .
Quote from: Soda on 2022-05-12 23:40:13Wow. New Northern Bay Area is AWESOME! It actually looks accurate now! They got that huge massive refinery in Richmond, the bridges, a more accurate flora. I recognize places coming into San Fran now with this new update! Sacramento is also 100 times better. It seems real now. I noticed a lot more urban development along the highways through the whole area, which is correct. It's a very urban area and it feels lived in now unlike before which was mostly empty highways with trees around it. No buildings. Oakland still is bad and San Francisco still is old and wrong. Hopefully that comes next.It's weird to drive through San Rafael, but not be able to take jobs from it anymore.
Wow. New Northern Bay Area is AWESOME! It actually looks accurate now! They got that huge massive refinery in Richmond, the bridges, a more accurate flora. I recognize places coming into San Fran now with this new update! Sacramento is also 100 times better. It seems real now. I noticed a lot more urban development along the highways through the whole area, which is correct. It's a very urban area and it feels lived in now unlike before which was mostly empty highways with trees around it. No buildings. Oakland still is bad and San Francisco still is old and wrong. Hopefully that comes next.
Quote from: MasterXtreme on 2022-05-11 14:17:39And I have a complaint... a sad one. These are not the type of tree's Texas has. Forests don't look like this in Texas. Hmmmm. Evergreen, pine, and sitka spruce do not grow as they show in this Texas update. This might be the first shocking incorrect thing I've ever seen from SCS. Uh oh. No part of Texas is as lush as these images show. There are forested parts, but not with these types of trees. Did they not create the right trees for some reason? I noticed that as well, and so did a user in the blog post. The more SCS see's this, the more they can fix it before release. I think part of the issue was that all of the animated props for forestry that SCS has is based off of trees for the Pacific Northwest. They didn't have a prop using the "proper" trees and they tried to fill it in with Pacific Northwest trees so the animated props wouldn't look out of place. Sadly, they will have to change to the correct trees and remodel some of the animated props to the correct trees if they want this to be more accurate.
And I have a complaint... a sad one. These are not the type of tree's Texas has. Forests don't look like this in Texas. Hmmmm. Evergreen, pine, and sitka spruce do not grow as they show in this Texas update. This might be the first shocking incorrect thing I've ever seen from SCS. Uh oh. No part of Texas is as lush as these images show. There are forested parts, but not with these types of trees. Did they not create the right trees for some reason?
and the port without a sea . Interesting... I never heard about calling the railway station like that. But anyway, I like these pretty brick buildings in the city.