I'm surprised you didn't get your typical red truck!
When that screenshot was published here, I already have got one
:
Due to sound of its horn I never wanted to drive Cascadia with a single trailer so far
. And actually, only four from current 12 garages have red trucks: the other ones are orange (3 garages), blue (2), black (2) and... uhm... electric pink
(1) — when the color circle arrived to ATS, I tried to use some named color for an experiment
. Also, in this year’s profile I have
«Progress» wheel model (painted or chromed) on all my trucks — I like it much more than other wheels.
And, while exploring the new truck further, I noticed than now Cascadia has an engine with the lowest torque peak —
DD 16 600’s have their 2050 lb·ft @ 975 rpm, when the 625-hp
Caterpillar — only at 1200 (600-hp
Volvo and
Cummins are between them, and
Paccar doesn’t have so much big engine, although it have a peak at 900 rpm), so it’s easier to climb on I-70 with the same fuel consumption
. Another interesting thing — if you set up the Aero-X deflector on the roof, you can’t use the vertical exhaust pipe at all — another step towards Europe
.
So, I tried the biggest cab for a new truck, but I see it’s optimal for me to use the one with 48" sleeper — even if it looks childish in front of high-roof one (
the same feeling as about how Actros MP3’s low floor cab looks if compared to high-floor one, despite the upper part height is similar), the difference in maximum fuel capacity is lowest among all other trucks (240 vs 220), all aerodynamic stuff is available, the chassis is shorter than some of daycabs — so, the real advantage of the most expensive sleeper is the look
.
...they named all their trucks after regional things from that region. Their trucks were the Columbia (Columbia River) and Cascadia (informal name of the region).
Well, before 2000’s there was no toponymical names, even the
Coronado came out in 2001.